WINDMILL EFFICIENCY

HOME    SITE INDEX   CATAMARAN HULL    SOLAR PANELS    ELECTRIC MOTORS    BATTERIES   CREW    EXPEDITION    SPONSORS  GOODIES

NASA COMMENTS OF WIND TURBINES

WINDMILL LINKS   WIND TURBINES

 

One can look at two or three blade windmills and see that most of the wind goes between the blades without effect. 

One of the reasons is that the mis-definition of energy creates the assumption that higher velocity blades deliver more power, since power is proportional to force times velocity with the erroneous definition of energy. But when definitions are corrected, power equals force only. (See Energy Mis-defined.) Therefore, two more blades could be added, which would increase output by two thirds at almost the same cost.

 

Windmills for generating electricity would be much more practical than assumed, except that their efficiency is not being properly utilized.

 

The overall efficiency of a windmill has to be directly measured, it cannot be calculated, because there are too many interacting factors. A good guess at design efficiency can be made by direct observation. Only measurements under operating conditions can improve upon direct observation.

 

So the US government spent a large amount of money (probably more than a billion dollars) during the late seventies and eighties creating experimental windmills for testing their practicality. The results were worthless, in spite of having tested dozens of windmills. None of the experimental windmills were designed for good overall efficiency, and the most important questions were not studied.

 

Overall efficiency means the amount of electricity that can be generated over time on a cost basis. In other words, will a kilowatt hour cost ten cents, twenty cents, or what?

 

Two factors are important in determining overall efficiency of a windmill. One is its ability to use low velocity wind, and the other is its conversion efficiency.

 

The ability to use low velocity wind determines whether the windmill is working or doing nothing while wind velocities are low, which is a large part of the time.

 

For example, an area might have wind of 15 miles per hour (mph) or greater 20% of the time, and 10 mph or greater 40% of the time. A windmill that can use 10 mph wind is operating 40% of the time, while one requiring 15 mph wind is only operating 20% of the time, which is half as much.

 

The windmills tested by the experimenters would not use low velocity wind. The minimum wind speed required by their "best" designs required more than 15 mph wind speed. There is no reason why 5-10 mph winds could not be utilized to create highly efficient windmills for generating electricity.

 

To utilize low velocity wind effectively, there has to be more blades. The researchers primarily studied two blade systems. They never even made comparisons to systems with more blades.

 

Conversion efficiency also requires more than two blades. More blades allows lower rpms, which results in less turbulence, so conversion is more efficient.

 

A quagmire of technicalities does not change these overall facts. Arguers will talk about torque and velocity trying to prove something, but it proves nothing, because there are infinite options in integrating all of those factors.

 

For example, they repeatedly say high rpm rotors are needed for generating electricity. That's mindlessness.

 

The tip speed of the blade increases as the circular diameter of motion increases. In the government experiments, two blade systems were used, with rotors up to 300 ft long. Tip speeds were in excess of 200 mph, which created problems with noise and vibrations. Normal rotation was 18 rpm. This means more than 3 seconds per revolution.

 

Notice that the rpms have to decrease as the diameter of motion increases. Otherwise tip speeds would by excessive. So the rpms are determined by the diameter of motion, not the number of blades.

 

Arguers say high rpm at low torque is needed for generating electricity, instead of low rpm and high torque. Fewer blades is how to do that. But they need a gear box regardless, and they make low velocity winds unusable with that approach. A gear box makes the torque-speed question irrelevant. And they contradict themselves to an extreme by using large diameters of motion, which is what really requires low rpms.

 

They could get the same rpms by using a smaller diameter of motion with more blades. They would then need more rotors per unit output, but those concerns are trivial technical challenges which are easily solved. Throwing away the low velocity wind and creating turbulence result in loss of efficiency.

 

The government experimenters said they could produce electricity at the usual price by using their large two blade systems, which required wind speeds in excess of 15 mph. This means that if systems were designed to use lower velocity winds with less turbulence, they would have produced electricity cheaper than other sources.

 

The design of the government windmills was extremely expensive due to the large size. Supposedly, the larger the size, the greater the efficiency. That point was not tested, but general appearance indicates that the technical difficulties of getting control of forces that high off the ground was not as cost-effective as smaller designs would be.

 

Let me say this in plain English. Anyone can look at an old-fashioned farm windmill, which had about 18 blades, and compare it to an experimental windmill, which had 2 blades, and see that the farm windmill was extremely efficient, and the experimental windmill is extremely inefficient. It is quite visible that unused wind goes between the blades with two and three blade systems. Propagandists use a lot of numbers and jargon to deny the obvious, but their numbers are not fact.

 

Modern wind farms use three blade systems, which is a major improvement over the two blade systems which were studied. Diameter is reduced from about 300 ft to about 120 ft, which reduces tip speeds and cumbersum stress forces. Whether four or five blades would be an improvement depends upon mechanical factors and reliability; but if smaller diameter and multi-blade systems were designed, they would be more practical for small users and home owners.


Relativity  Global Warming  Ice Ages  Asteroid  Geology  Earth's Core  Tornadoes  Windmills  Transgenic Crops

The Sun God  Art that Proves  Nov55L inks

WINDMILL LINKS   WIND TURBINES

CONTACT:  nelson@solarnavigator.net  07905 147709 (UK)

 

This website is Copyright 1999 & 2004  NJK.   The bird logo and name Solar Navigator are trademarks. All rights reserved.  All other trademarks are hereby acknowledged.       www.maxenergy.org  is an environmental educational charity.

SPEED ACE   JAMAIS-CONTENTE   SOLAR CARS   LEAD-WEDGE   SILVER-EAGLE   BATTERY-BOX   LIGHTNING-ROD    WHITE-LIGHTNING   BUCKEYE BULLET   EMOTION  BLUEBIRD 3

BLUEBIRD HOMEPAGE  PARRY THOMAS  HENRY SEAGRAVE  JOHN COBB  MALCOLM CAMPBELL  DONALD CAMPBELL  CRAIG BREEDLOVE  KEN WARBY  RICHARD NOBLE   DON VESCO